Two people, same job. Both work 12-hour days, but one achieves twice as much as the other.
The difference? Leverage.
Leverage is the ability to achieve more without working more. It’s what separates those who are constantly overwhelmed from those who operate at scale. With leverage, you’re closing major deals while your assistant finalizes contracts and logistics. You're developing your speech at an international trade conference while they plan your trip — flights, hotels, and transportation all ready to go.
Without it, you're stuck doing it all yourself; you have no leverage.
Most leaders learn delegation the hard way—through trial and error. They hire an assistant and hope to figure it out as they go.
Three months in, they’re asking themselves:
→ "Why isn’t this saving me more time?"
→ "How do I know if I’m delegating the right things?"
→ "Should I just do this myself?"
This reactive approach leads to limited trust, limited delegation, and limited leverage. Your assistant becomes just another task-taker.
But with a structured approach, delegation becomes a system, not an experiment—a repeatable framework that compounds over time.
To systematically achieve leverage, think of delegation as a simple equation:
Leverage = (Context + Mindset + Feedback) × Delegations
Each component—Context, Mindset, Feedback, and Delegations—is an action you control.
Delegations are multiplied because they amplify the impact of Context, Mindset, and Feedback when done effectively. The more delegations you make, the more leverage you achieve.
→ Skip any element, and the system breaks. Do you agree?
Let’s break each component down.
Context is what transforms an assistant from a task-taker into a trusted decision-maker. Without it, they’ll rely on constant check-ins. With it, they’ll anticipate your needs and act as your proxy.
There are three levels of context that must be clear:
Your assistant needs to understand the landscape you operate in—both professionally and personally.
Business context:
Example: The "what" context varies by industry—a small business prioritizes customer acquisition and cash flow, a hedge fund focuses on portfolio performance and risk mitigation, and a government agency emphasizes public service delivery and regulatory compliance.
Personal preferences:
Example: some people thrive with early morning deep work sessions and prefer asynchronous communication, while others perform best in the afternoon and rely on real-time collaboration to stay productive.
Key relationships:
This is how you think, prioritize, and navigate complexity.
Example: If an assistant knows you prioritize speed over perfection, they won’t over-optimize small details; whereas if you’re the type to get irritated by seeing typos and small mistakes, ask them to prioritize quality over speed.
The rules of engagement for working with you.
Communication:
Operating rules:
Unwritten rules:
When these three layers of context are in place, your assistant stops asking “What should I do?” and starts thinking, “What would you do?”
Your mindset shapes how effectively you delegate.
Most people sabotage themselves with thoughts like:
❌ "It’s faster if I do it myself."
❌ "No one can do this as well as I can."
But effective delegators embrace imperfection, inefficiency, and iteration.
✔ High tolerance for failure – They understand that mistakes are part of the process.
✔ High tolerance for inefficiency – They know training takes time but pays off exponentially.
✔ High tolerance for iteration – They refine delegation over time, not overnight.
✔ Have a satisficer’s mindset
✔ Default to delegation – They understand the hidden math with delegation
✔ Understand payout structure – They focus on tasks that matter 1000x more than others.
Example: If you spend 10 hours training an assistant to take over a 5-hour recurring task, it might feel like a waste at first. But after 3 months, you’ve saved 50+ hours and scaled yourself.
Feedback isn’t just for fixing mistakes—it’s the engine of growth and alignment. But for it to work, it can’t just be a knee-jerk reaction when something goes wrong. It needs to be intentional, part of a system that builds context, sharpens instincts, and strengthens trust over time.
The real shift happens when feedback stops being random course corrections and becomes a structured, repeatable process—one that doesn’t just tell people what to do, but immerses them in how you think.
Four tactics to give better feedback:
The real power of feedback isn’t just about getting tasks right or improving performance—it’s about creating a system where others absorb your thinking and values, so they can make decisions like you would.
When feedback is structured and continuous, it stops being a series of one-off corrections and instead becomes a framework for better judgment, independent problem-solving, and long-term alignment.
The path to leverage is simple:
✔ Delegate early.
✔ Delegate often.
The more delegations you make, the more leverage you gain.
Most people hesitate because of perfectionism.
❌ "No one else can do this exactly like me."
❌ "I’ll just fix it myself."
Instead, shift to a value-first mindset:
✔ "Did I get any value from this?"
✔ "Is this moving in the right direction?"
Over time, active delegations decrease as your assistant’s agency increases. The goal? More things happening without you asking.
Here are some additional ways to find delegations:
See our ongoing and expanding list of delegation ideas
The true measure of leverage is when your decisions, systems, and team create exponential outcomes with minimal direct input from you.
This ideally culminates with an assistant as dedicated to your success as you are. It’s a sort of pronoia, a feeling that the world is conspiring for you. Doors open up, things get done that you didn’t even know were in motion.
You’ll know you’ve achieved it when your assistant anticipates needs before you articulate them, your systems hum along without intervention, and your time is spent exclusively on what truly matters.